Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy AnalysisThe study of metropolitan political economies in the United States has provided much of the intellectual inspiration for the research of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University. The readings collected in Polycentricity and Local Public Economies present an overview of the results of this research program on police services and metropolitan governance as well as enduring lessons for institutional analysis and public policy. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies presents both explorations of broad general concepts and specific empirical analyses. The many interactions between the two modes of analysis provide valuable insights for the reader. Readings in the first section cover basic theoretical concepts and analytical distinctions that apply to the study of institutions generally. The second section includes conceptual pieces specifically addressed to the nature of governance in metropolitan areas, while section three reports on a series of empirical studies of police performance. Section four again broadens the focus to highlight the overall organization of local public economies. The final section discusses conceptual advances that have continuing relevance for research and policy debates. Contributors include William Blomquist, Kathryn Firmin-Sellers, Roy Gardner, Dele Olowu, Elinor Ostrom, Vincent Ostrom, Amos Sawyer, Edella Schlager, Shui Yan Tang, Wai Fung Lam, and James S. Wunsch. Michael McGinnis is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and Co-Associate Director, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University. |
Što ljudi govore - Napišite recenziju
Na uobičajenim mjestima nismo pronašli nikakve recenzije.
Sadržaj
The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas A Theoretical Inquiry | 31 |
Polycentricity Part 1 | 52 |
Public Goods and Public Choices | 75 |
A Behavioral Approach to the Study of Intergovernmental Relations | 107 |
Polycentricity Part 2 | 119 |
Metropolitan Reform Propositions Derived from Two Traditions | 139 |
Why Do We Need Multiple Indicators of Public Service Outputs? | 163 |
Does Local Community Control of Police Make a Difference? Some Preliminary Findings | 176 |
Neither Gargantua nor the Land of Lilliputs Conjectures on Mixed Systems of Metropolitan Organization | 284 |
Citizen Voice and Public Entrepreneurship The Organizational Dynamic of a Complex Metropolitan County | 306 |
Fiscal Service and Political Impacts of IndianapolisMarion Countys Unigov | 329 |
Do We Really Want to Consolidate Urban Areas? Its Like Deja Vu All over Again | 349 |
Complex Models of Urban Service Systems | 355 |
Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services Some Economic and Institutional Considerations | 381 |
Suggested Further Readings | 393 |
Contributors | 397 |
Community Control and Governmental Responsiveness The Case of Police in Black Neighborhoods | 203 |
Size and Performance in a Federal System | 232 |
Defining and Measuring Structural Variations in Interorganizational Arrangements | 265 |
Ostala izdanja - Prikaži sve
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
activities Administration agencies alternative American analysis arrangements associated authority benefits bureau Center Chapter Chicago choice citizens collective consolidation constitutional consumer consumption costs County crime criminal decision Development districts economy effect efficient efforts elections Elinor enforcement evaluation example exist experience force function given governmental higher important increase independent Indianapolis indicate individuals industry inputs institutional interests jurisdictions larger less levels Louis managers means measures ment metropolitan area multiplicity municipal neighborhoods officers operating organization Ostrom output Parks particular patrol patterns performance police departments political polycentric population positive possible preferences Press problems production public service receive reform regular relationships relative reported require residents response Review rules scale Science serving similar structure supply theory tion types units University Urban variables victimization Workshop