Slike stranica
PDF
ePub

2

3

discovering that a great merchant vessel, which he descried with admiration sailing into the harbour of Bucoleon, was the property of Theodora, who had secretly engaged in mercantile speculation. “What!” he exclaimed, “my wife has made me, the Emperor, a merchant!" He commanded the ship and all its valuable cargo to be consigned to the flames."

These tales, whatever measure of truth may underlie them, redounded to the credit of Theophilus in the opinion of those who repeated them ; they show that he was a popular figure in Constantinople, and that his memory, as of a just ruler, was revered by the next generation. We can accept without hesitation the tradition of his accessibility to his subjects in his weekly progresses to Blachernae, and it is said that he lingered on his way in the bazaars, systematically examining the wares, especially the food, and inquiring the prices. He was doubtless assiduous also in presiding at the Imperial court of appeal, which met in the Palace of Magnaura, here following the examples of Nicephorus and Leo the Armenian.

The desirability of such minute personal supervision of the administration may have been forced on Theophilus by his own observations during his father's reign, and he evidently attempted to cross, so far as seemed politic, those barriers which hedged the monarch from direct contact with the life of the people. As a rule, the Emperor was only visible to the ordinary mass of his subjects when he rode in solemn pomp through the city to the Holy Apostles or some other church, or when he appeared to watch the public games from his throne in the Hippodrome. The regular, unceremonial ride of Theophilus to Blachernae was an innovation, and if it did not afford him the opportunities of overhearing the gossip of the town which Harun al-Rashid is said by the story-tellers to have obtained by nocturnal expeditions in disguise, it may have helped a discerning eye to some useful information.

The political activity of Theophilus seems to have been directed to the efficient administration of the existing laws and the improvement of administrative details ; 4 his govern

4

[blocks in formation]

2 Cont. Th. 87.

Cp. ib. 88 εν κριτηρίοις. 4 For the new Themes which he instituted, see below, Chap. VII. § 2.

2

3

[ocr errors]

5

6

ment was not distinguished by novel legislation or any radical reform. His laws have disappeared and left no visible traces—like almost all the Imperial legislation between the reigns of Leo III. and Basil I. Of one important enactment we are informed.

The law did not allow marriage except between orthodox Christians.? But there was a large influx, during his reign, of orientals who were in rebellion against the Caliph, and Theophilus, to encourage the movement, passed a law permitting alliance between Mohammadan “ Persians and Romans.4 This measure accorded with his reputation for being a friend of foreigners.”

One of the first measures of the reign was an act of policy, performed in the name of justice. According to one account 6 the people had gathered in the Hippodrome to witness horseraces, and at the end of the performance the Emperor assembled the Senate in the Kathisma, from which he witnessed the games, and ordered Leo Chamaidrakon, the Keeper of the Private Wardrobe, to produce the chandelier which had been broken when Leo V. was cut down by his murderers in the chapel of the Palace. Pointing to this, Theophilus asked, “What is the desert of him who enters the temple of the Lord and slays the Lord's anointed ?” The Senate replied, “Death," and the Emperor immediately commanded the Prefect of the City to seize the men who had slain Leo and decapitate them in the Hippodrome before the assembled people. The astonished

[blocks in formation]

1 A law concerning the fashion of wearing tbe hair is attributed to him in Cont. Th. 107. His own hair was thin, and he decreed (0OTLO ev and νόμον εξέθετο) that no Roman should allow his hair to fall below the neck, alleging the virtuous fashion of the ancient Romans.

Such an edict is grossly improbable. We may suspect that he introduced a regulation of the kind in regard to soldiers ; and some light is thrown on the matter by an anecdote (recorded about A.D. 845-847) in Acta 42 Mart. Amor. 24-25. Kallistos, a count of the Schools (i.e., captain of a company in the Scholarian Guards), presented himself to the Emperor with long untidy hair and beard (αυχμηρά τινι κόμη και αφιλοκαλω γενειάδι). Theophilus very naturally administered a severe rebuke to the officer, and ordered him to be

a

3 See below, Chap. VIII. p. 252. 4 Cont. Th. 112.

5 φιλοεθνής των πώποτε βασιλέων, Acta 42 Mart, Amor. 27 where he is said to have been fond of negroes (Aidiotes), of whom he formed military bandon. This passage also refers to marriages of foreigners with Roman

συναγηγερκώς ек διαφόρων γλωσσών ότι πλείστην συμμορίαν ούς και ζεύγνυσθαι ταις θυγατράσι των πολιτών προς δε και αστυγειτόνων βιαστικώς συντάξας ανέτρεψε τα Ρωμαίων αίσια.

6 Simeon, Add. Georg. 791.

women :

a

3

victims of such belated justice naturally exclaimed, “If we had not assisted your father, 0 Emperor, you would not now be on the throne.” There are other versions of the circumstances, and it is possible that the assassins were condemned at a formal silention in the Magnaura.' It would be useless to judge this punishment by any ethical standard. Michael II. had not only a guilty knowledge of the conspiracy, but had urged the conspirators to hasten their work. The passion of a doctrinaire for justice will not explain his son's act in calling his father's accomplices to a tardy account; nor is there the least probability in the motive which some image-worshippers assigned, that respect for the memory of Leo as a great iconoclast inspired him to wreak vengeance on the murderers.? The truth, no doubt, is that both Michael II. and Theophilus were acutely conscious that the deed which had raised them to power cast an ugly shadow over their throne; and it is noteworthy that in the letter which they addressed to the Emperor Lewis they stigmatize the conspirators as wicked men. Michael, we may be assured, showed them no favour, but he could not bring himself to punish the men whom he had himself encouraged to commit the crime. The conscience of Theophilus was clear, and he could definitely dissociate the Amorian house from the murder by a public act of retribution. It may well be that (as one tradition affirmns 4) Michael, when death was approaching, urged his son to this step. case, it seems certain that the purpose of Theophilus was to remedy a weakness in his political position, and that he was taking account of public opinion.

The Augusta Euphrosyne, last Imperial descendant of the Isaurian house, retired to a monastery soon after her stepson's accession to the supreme power.

Michael is related to have bound the Senate by a pledge that they would defend the rights of his second wife and her children after his death. If this is true, it meant that if she had a son his position should be secured as co-regent of his stepbrother. She had no children, and found perhaps little attraction in the prospect of 1 Gen. 51.

Add. Georg. 789, that Theophilus 2 Add. Georg., ib.

reigned along with Euphrosyne is a 3 Ep. ad Lud. 418, a quibusdam corollary from the error that she was improbis.”

his mother, and brought about his Gen. 51.

marriage with Theodora after his 5 Cont. Th. 78. The statement in father's death.

In any

3

4

residing in the Palace and witnessing Court functions in which Theodora would now be the most important figure. There is no reason to suppose that she retired under compulsion.

The first five children born to Theophilus during his father's lifetime were daughters, but just before or soon after his accession Theodora gave birth to a son, who was named Constantine and crowned as Augustus. Constantine, however, did not survive infancy, and the Emperor had to take thought for making some provision for the succession. He selected as a son-in-law Alexios Musele, who belonged to the family of the Krênitai, of Armenian descent, and betrothed him to his eldest daughter, Maria (c. A.D. 831). Alexios (who had been created a patrician and distinguished by the new title of anthypatos, and then elevated to the higher rank of magister) received the dignity of Caesar, which gave him a presumptive expectation of a still higher title. The marriage was celebrated about A.D. 836, but Maria died soon afterwards, and, against the Emperor's wishes, his son-in-law insisted on retiring to a monastery. There was a story that the suspicions of

a Theophilus had been aroused by jealous tongues against the loyalty of Alexios, who had been sent to fight with the Saracens in Sicily. It is impossible to say how much truth may underlie this report, nor can we be sure whether the Caesar withdrew from the world before or after the birth of a son to Theophilus (in A.D. 839), an event which would in any case have disappointed his hopes of the succession.”

1 On the retirement of Euphrosyne, Melioranski, ib. see Melioranski, Viz. Vrem. 8, 32-33. 2 He probably died c. A.D. 835. For The statements of Simeon (Add. Georg. the evidence for Constantine, for the 790) and Cont. Th. 86 contradict each argument that Maria was the eldest other; according to the latter she was daughter, for the chronology, and for (laudably) expelled from the Palace the coins, see Appendix VI. by Theophilus (accepted as true by Mushegh, in Armenian; cp. St. Hirsch, 205). I think Melioranski is Martin apud Lebeau, xiii. 118, who right in following the former (Viz. thinks he was descended from the Vrem. 8, 32-33), but his observations Mamigonians. His namesake, who about the chronology do not hold. held high posts under Irene and ConCont. Th. is undoubtedly right in stantine VI., may have been his stating that Euphrosyne withdrew to father. the cloister in which she had formerly 4 See Bury, Imp. Administration, been a nun (in the island of Prinkipo ; 28. see above, p. 111); she had nothing to Cp. Appendix VI. ad fin. Theodo with the monastery of Gastria, to philus gave Alexios three monasteries, which Simeon sends her (Add. Georg. one of them at Chrysopolis. But 790; cp. Vit. Theodorae Aug. p. 6). Alexios wished to found a cloister Gastria belonged to Theoktiste, the himself; and taking a walk northmother-in-law of Theophilus. See ward from Chrysopolis along the shore,

5

3

5

1

3

While he was devoted to the serious business of ruling, and often had little time for the ceremonies and formal processions which occupied many hours in the lives of less active Emperors, Theophilus loved the pageantry of royal magnificence. On two occasions he celebrated a triumph over the Saracens, and we are so fortunate as to possess an official account of the triumphal ceremonies.? When Theophilus (in A.D. 831) reached the Palace of Hieria, near Chalcedon, he was awaited by the Empress, the three ministers -the Praepositus, the chief Magister, and the urban Prefectwho were responsible for the safety of the city during his absence, and by all the resident members of the Senate.

At a little distance from the Palace gates, the senators met him and did obeisance; Theodora stood within the rails of the hall which opened on the court, and when her lord dismounted she also did obeisance and kissed him. The train of captives had not yet arrived, and ten days elapsed before the triumphal entry could be held. Seven were spent at Hieria, the senators remaining in ceremonial attendance upon the Emperor, and their wives, who were summoned from the city, upon the Empress. On the seventh day the Court* moved to the Palace of St. Mamas, and remained there for three days. On the tenth, Theophilus sailed up the Golden Horn, disembarked at Blachernae, and proceeded on horseback outside the walls to a pavilion which had been pitched in a meadow near the Golden Gate. Here he met the captives who had been conveyed across the Propontis from Chrysopolis.

Meanwhile, under the direction of the Prefect, the city had been set in festive array, decorated “like a bridal chamber,"

[ocr errors]

5

2

he came on a site which pleased him stantinopolis, ii. 297-304). The urban in the suburb of Anthemios, some- quarter of Anthemios (ib. 467-469) was where near the modern Anadoli- north-north - west of the Cistern of Hissar. The ground belonged to the Mokios (Chukur-Bostan), in the west Imperial arsenal (mangana), but,

of the City. through the influence of Theodora, 1 See Cont. Th. 88. Alexios was permitted to buy it. His περί ταξ. 503 sqq. Cp. below, tomb and that of his brother existed

pp. 254, 261. here in the following century (Cont. 3 In the performance of his function Th. 109). Pargoire (Boradion, 456 sqq., as regent during Imperial absences, 473-475) has shown that the suburban the praepositus was designated as o quarter of Anthemios was near Anadoli- διέπων or ο απομονεύς. Cp. Bury, Imp. Hissar-north of Brochthoi, which was Adm. System, 124. near Kandili, and south of Boradion, 4 The ladies perhaps returned to the which was near Phrixu-limen=Kanlija city: (for these districts see Hammer, Con- The meadow of the κομβινοστάσιον.

« PrethodnaNastavi »