« PrethodnaNastavi »
The rise of Paphlagonia in importance may be connected with the active Pontic policy of Theophilus. It is not
) without significance that Paphlagonian ships played a part in the expedition which he sent to Cherson, and we may conjecture with probability that the creation of the Theme of the Klimata on the north of the Euxine and that of Paphlagonia on the south were not isolated acts, but were part of the same general plan. The institution of the Theme of Chaldia, which was cut off from the Armeniac Theme) (probably A.D. 837), may also be considered as part of the general policy of strengthening Imperial control over the Black Sea and its coastlands, here threatened by the imminence of the Moslem power in Armenia. To the south of Chaldia was the duchy of Koloneia, also part of the Armeniac circumscription. In the following reign (before A.D. 863) both Koloneia and Cappadocia were elevated to the rank of Themes.
The Themes of Europe, which formed a class apart from those of Asia, seem at the end of the eighth century to have been four in number—Thrace, Macedonia, Hellas, and Sicily. There were also a number of provinces of inferior rankCalabria, under its Dux; Dalmatia and Crete, under governors who had the title of archon;' while Thessalonica with the adjacent region was still subject to the ancient Praetorian is that Paphlagonia was a katepanate A.D. 845-847 (Acta 27, 29). The before it acquired the rank of a stratê- Emperor before his death directed gia. Michael, Vita Theod. Stud. 309, that Kallistos Melissenos should be referring to the reign of Michael II., sent to Koloneia και την του δουκός speaks of το θέμα των Παφλαγόνων, but διέπειν αρχήν. Kallistos is called a the use of Oéua in such a passage can- turmarch in Simeon, Add. Georg. 805 ; not be urged as evidence for the date. Koloneia was doubtless a turmarchy 1 See below, p. 416.
in the Armeniac Theme. Koloneia is
not mentioned by the Arabic writers ? The circumstances are discussed
who depend on Al-Garmi or in the below, p. 261. Chaldia may have Takt. Usp. I conclude that till after also existed already as a separate the death of Theophilus it had not command of less dignity, under a been separated from the Armeniac Duke. For Takt. Usp., which mentions Theme,or, in other words, that Kallistos the stratêgos, names also in another
was the first Dux. Another inference place (119) ο δούξ Χαλδίας. I explain
may be that the Taktikon represents this as a survival from an older official
the official world immediately after list, which the compiler neglected to the accession of Michael III. eliminate. In the same document 4 Cont. Th. 181. Cp. Brooks, op. cit. åpxovtes of Chaldia are also mentioned.
70, for Masudi's evidence. These were probably local authorities
Calabria : Gay, L'Italie mér. in some of the towns, like the archons
Takt. Usp. 124. Dalmatia : • åpxwv of Cherson.
A., ib. Crete : ib. 119 ó åpxwv K. 3 The evidence for a Dux of Koloneia (which I interpret as a case, like that under Theophilus is in an account of of Chaldia, where an older office is the Amorian martyrs dating from retained in the list).
Prefect of Illyricum, an anomalous survival from the old system of Constantine. It was doubtless the Slavonic revolt in the reign of Nicephorus I. that led to the reorganization of the Helladic province, and the constitution of the Peloponnesus
a distinct Theme, so that Hellas henceforward meant Northern Greece. The Mohammadan descent upon Crete doubtless led to the appointment of a stratêgos instead of an archon of Crete, and the Bulgarian wars to the suppression of the Praetorian prefect by a stratêgos of Thessalonica. The Theme of Kephalonia (with the Ionian Islands) seems to have existed at the beginning of the ninth century ;5 but the Saracen menace to the Hadriatic and the western coasts of Greece may account for the foundation of the Theme of Dyrrhachium, a city which probably enjoyed, like the communities of the Dalmatian coast, a certain degree of local independence. If so, we may compare the policy of Theophilus in instituting the stratêgos of the Klimata with control over the magistrates of Cherson.?
It is to be noted that the Theme of Thrace did not include the region in the immediate neighbourhood of Constantinople, cut off by the Long Wall of Anastasius, who had made special provisions for the government of this region. In the ninth century it was still a separate circumscription, probably under the military command of the Count of the Walls, and Arabic writers designate it by the curious name Talaya or Tafla."
A table will exhibit the general result of all these changes :
1. Anatolic. 2. Armeniac. 3. Thrakesian.
1 Theodore Stud. Epp. i. 3, p. 917 (του υπάρχου). This evidence is overlooked by Gelzer, Themenverfassung,
2 First mentioned in Scr. Incert. 336 (A.D. 813).
3 See below, p. 289.
6 Ιb. 115; cp. 124 οι άρχοντες του Δυρραχίου.
7 See below, p. 417.
9 Talaya seems to be the best attested form (Brooks, op. cit. 69, 72). Gelzer, 86 sqq., operates with Tafla and thinks the district was called ή τάφρος. The solution has not yet been discovered.
II. There were considerable differences in the ranks and salaries of the stratégoi. In the first place, it is to be noticed that the governors of the Asiatic provinces, the admirals of the naval Themes, and the stratégoi of Thrace and Macedonia were paid by the treasury, while the governors of the European Themes paid themselves a fixed amount from the custom dues levied in their own provinces. Hence for administrative purposes Thrace and Macedonia are generally included among the Asiatic Themes. The rank of patrician was bestowed as a rule upon the Anatolic, Armeniac, and Thrakesian stratégoi, and these three received a salary of 40 lbs. of gold (£1728). The pay of the other stratégoi and kleisurarchs ranged from 36 to 12 lbs, but their stipends were somewhat reduced in the course of the ninth century. We can easily calculate that the total cost of paying the governors of the eastern provinces (including Macedonia and Thrace) did not fall short of £15,000.
1 Constantine, Cer. 697, referring been lowered (Cer., ib.). If we apply to the reign of Leo VI. There is every the figures given by Ibn Khurdadhbah reason to suppose that the system was to the corresponding categories in older.
the table of Themes under Michael 2 Ibn Khurdadhbah, 85..“ The pay III. (36 lbs. = £1555 : 4s. ; 24 lbs. of the officers is at the maximum = £1036 : 16s. ; 12 lbs. = £518 : 8s.; 40 lbs ; it descends to 36, 24, 12, 6 6 lbs. =£259 : 4s.), we get for the total and even to 1 lb." The salaries which amount paid to the military comobtained under Leo VI. (Cer., ib.) manders £16,558 : 16s. But it must enable us to apply this information. be remembered that the reduction of There we have 5 classes :-(1) 40 lbs. : salaries may have been made under Anatol., Arm., Thrakes. (2) 30 lbs. : Michael III., or even before the death Opsik., Bukell., Maced. (3) 20 lbs. : of Theophilus, and may have been Capp., Chars., Paphl., Thrace, Kol. connected with the increase in the (4) 10 lbs. : Kib., Samos, Aig. Pel. number of the Themes. It seems, for (5) 5 lbs. :. 4 kleisurarchies. It is instance, probable that when Koloneia clear that in the interval between became a stratégia the salary may Theophilus and Leo VI. the salaries, have been fixed at 20 lbs. But the data with the exception of the highest, had are sufficient for a rough estimate.
In these provinces there is reason to suppose that the number of troops, who were chiefly cavalry, was about 80,000.1 They were largely settled on military lands, and their pay was small. The recruit, who began service at a very early age, received one nomisma (12s.) in his first year, two in his second, and so on, till the maximum of twelve (£7: 4s.), or in some cases of eighteen (£10:16s.), was reached.?
The army of the Theme was divided generally into two, sometimes three, turms or brigades; the turm into drungoi or battalions; and the battalion into banda or companies. The corresponding commanders were entitled turmarchs, drungaries, and counts. The number of men in the company, the sizes of the battalion and the brigade, varied widely in the different Themes. The original norm seems to have been a bandon of 200 men and a drungos of 5 banda. It is very doubtful whether this uniform scheme still prevailed in the reign of Theophilus. It is certain that at a somewhat later period the bandon varied in size up to the maximum of 400, and the drungos oscillated between the limits of 1000 and 3000 men. Originally the turm was composed of 5 drungoi (5000 men), but this rule was also changed. The number of drungoi in
i Ibn Kudama, 197 sqq., gives the total for the Asiatic provinces as 70,000, but the sum of his items does not correspond. The number of troops in Paphlagonia is omitted, and Gelzer is probably right in supplying 4000 (op. cit. 98). He is also right in observing that the figure 4000 assigned to the Armeniacs must be wrong, but I cannot agree with his emendation, 10,000. For the number of the Thrakesians 6000 must also be incorrect; they cannot have been less numerous than the Bukellarians, who were 8000. I would therefore write 8000 for the Thrakesians, and 8000 for the Armeniacs (not too few for this Theme reduced by the separation of Chaldia and Charsianon). With these corrections we get the required sum 70,000. The same author gives 5000 for Thrace, to which we must add another 5000 for Macedonia (but these numbers may be under the mark). Ibn Khurdadhbah (84) asserts that the whole army numbered 120,000 men, and a patrician (i.e. a stratégos) commanded 10,000. The actual organ
ization never corresponded to this
2 Ibn Khurdadhbah makes two
the turm was reduced to three, so that the brigade which the turmarch commanded ranged from 3000 upwards.
The pay of the officers, according to one account, ranged from 3 lbs. to 1 lb., and perhaps the subalterns in the company (the kentarchs and pentekontarchs) are included; but the turmarchs in the larger themes probably received a higher salary than 3 lbs.
If we assume that the average bandon was composed of 300 men and the average drungos of 1500, and further that the pay of the drungary was 3 lbs., that of the count 2 lbs. and that of the kentarch 1 lb., the total sum expended on these officers would have amounted to about £64,000. But these assumptions are highly uncertain. Our data for the pay of the common soldiers form a still vaguer basis for calculation; but we may conjecture, with every reserve, that the salaries of the armies of the Eastern Themes, including generals and officers, amounted to not less than £500,000.
The armies of the Themes formed only one branch of the military establishment. There were four other privileged and differently organized cavalry regiments known as the Tagmata : (1) the Schools, (2) the Excubitors, (3) the Arithmos or Vigla, and (4) the Hikanatoi. The first three were of ancient foundation; the fourth was a new institution of Nicephorus I., who created a child, his grandson Nicetas (afterwards the Patriarch Ignatius), its first commander. The commanders of ) these troops were entitled Domestics, except that of the Arithmos, who was known as the Drungary of the Vigla or Watch. Some companies of these Tagmatic troops may have been stationed at Constantinople, where the Domestics usually resided, but the greater part of them were quartered in Thrace,
1 We cannot, I think, use the evidence in the documents concerning the Cretan expeditions of A.D. 902 and 949 (in Constantine, Cer. ii. chaps. 44 and 45) for controlling the Arabic statements as to the pay of soldiers and officers. For instance, we find the detachment of 3000 Thrakesians receiving 2 nomismata each (p. 655) in A.D. 902; and men of the Sebastean Theme receiving 4 n. each (p. 656), while the officers of the same Theme are paid-turmarchs 12 n., drungaries 10 n., counts 5 n. It seems probable
that these sums represent extra pay given for special expeditions oversea, and are outside the regular military budget. See below. We cannot draw conclusions from the sum of 1100 pounds=£475,222 which was sent in A.D. 809 to pay the army on the Strymon, as we do not know the number of the troops or whether the sum included arrears.
2 See Bury, Imp. Admin. System, 47 $99.
3 Nicet. Vita Ign. 213.