Coercive Family Process, Opseg 3 |
Iz unutrašnjosti knjige
Rezultati 1 - 3 od 78.
Stranica 85
Chapter 5 5 There are certain behaviors of family members which reliably produce aggressive reactions from antisocial children . The connection between the aggressive response of the child and the stimulus which controls its occurrence ...
Chapter 5 5 There are certain behaviors of family members which reliably produce aggressive reactions from antisocial children . The connection between the aggressive response of the child and the stimulus which controls its occurrence ...
Stranica 151
Given that the other person was coercive , what was the likelihood that the target family member would counterattack ? As shown in Table 7.6 , the likelihood of counterattack varied as a function of sample and dyad .
Given that the other person was coercive , what was the likelihood that the target family member would counterattack ? As shown in Table 7.6 , the likelihood of counterattack varied as a function of sample and dyad .
Stranica 253
The general pattern was for family members in the mixed group to be slightly more coercive than members of Social Aggressor families and a great deal more so than members of Stealer families . The family members of mixed cases also ...
The general pattern was for family members in the mixed group to be slightly more coercive than members of Social Aggressor families and a great deal more so than members of Stealer families . The family members of mixed cases also ...
Što ljudi govore - Napišite recenziju
Na uobičajenim mjestima nismo pronašli nikakve recenzije.
Sadržaj
Chapter | 1 |
Chapter | 11 |
Chapter 3 | 41 |
Autorska prava | |
Broj ostalih dijelova koji nisu prikazani: 7
Ostala izdanja - Prikaži sve
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
adults aggressive analysis antecedent antisocial children assumed attacks aversive aversive events baseline boys caretaker changes Chapter child behavior clinical coercive Command comparable conditional consequences consistent continue correlation delinquency demonstrated described determine deviant effect example experience extremely fact family members fathers Figure findings followed function given hypothesis identified included increase interaction involved irritable kind later learning less likelihood mean measures ment mothers negative normal noted observation occur OSLC outcome parents Patterson peers performance person physical positive present problem produce punishment question rates reactions referred Reid reinforcement relation reported response result reviewed role rules sample scores seems sequence served showed shown siblings significant significantly similar skills Social Aggressors Stealers stealing subjects suggest Table tend theory thought tion treatment values variables