Coercive Family Process, Opseg 3 |
Iz unutrašnjosti knjige
Rezultati 1 - 3 od 89.
Stranica 151
As shown in Table 7.6 , the likelihood of counterattack varied as a function of sample and dyad . In normal families the figure ranged from .08 to .19 , the range in the clinical samples was .10 to .28 . In all comparisons the problem ...
As shown in Table 7.6 , the likelihood of counterattack varied as a function of sample and dyad . In normal families the figure ranged from .08 to .19 , the range in the clinical samples was .10 to .28 . In all comparisons the problem ...
Stranica 253
The eight variables identified by Simard were then used in a discriminant - function analysis . The means and F values for a slightly different subset of samples than Simard's are presented in Table 11.2 . Two functions were derived ...
The eight variables identified by Simard were then used in a discriminant - function analysis . The means and F values for a slightly different subset of samples than Simard's are presented in Table 11.2 . Two functions were derived ...
Stranica 255
At a more speculative level , I think that all of these problem behaviors share a common coercive function . The way in which it is manifested varies somewhat as a function of what the parents will accept .
At a more speculative level , I think that all of these problem behaviors share a common coercive function . The way in which it is manifested varies somewhat as a function of what the parents will accept .
Što ljudi govore - Napišite recenziju
Na uobičajenim mjestima nismo pronašli nikakve recenzije.
Sadržaj
Chapter | 1 |
Chapter | 11 |
Chapter 3 | 41 |
Autorska prava | |
Broj ostalih dijelova koji nisu prikazani: 7
Ostala izdanja - Prikaži sve
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
adults aggressive analysis antecedent antisocial children assumed attacks aversive aversive events baseline boys caretaker changes Chapter chil child behavior clinical coercive Command comparable conditional consequences consistent continue correlation delinquency demonstrated described determine deviant effect example experience extremely fact family members fathers Figure findings followed function given hypothesis identified included increase interaction involved irritable kind later learning less likelihood mean measures ment mothers negative normal noted observation occur OSLC outcome parents Patterson peers performance person physical positive present problem produce punishment question rates reactions referred Reid reinforcement relation reported response result reviewed role rules sample scores seems sequence served showed shown siblings significant significantly similar skills Social Aggressors Stealers stealing subjects suggest Table tend theory thought tion treatment values variables