Coercive Family Process, Opseg 3 |
Iz unutrašnjosti knjige
Rezultati 1 - 3 od 81.
Stranica 56
Figure 3.3 Fake Good , Fake Bad , and Normal Conditions for Two Samples ( adapted from Lobitz & Johnson , 1975 , p . 72 ) Normal Experimental Conditions Normal Deviant Table 3.4 Mean Total Deviant Behaviors for Four Conditions (.
Figure 3.3 Fake Good , Fake Bad , and Normal Conditions for Two Samples ( adapted from Lobitz & Johnson , 1975 , p . 72 ) Normal Experimental Conditions Normal Deviant Table 3.4 Mean Total Deviant Behaviors for Four Conditions (.
Stranica 252
The first step was to determine whether families of Social Aggressors were significantly different in interaction patterns from families of Normals and families of Stealers . The analyses proceeded in a sequence of two steps .
The first step was to determine whether families of Social Aggressors were significantly different in interaction patterns from families of Normals and families of Stealers . The analyses proceeded in a sequence of two steps .
Stranica 257
Normal Younger Older F value by : Age Antecedent Group Interaction Parents 0.74 Overall Aversive Neutral Positive .79 .66 ... 1.76 5.33 * 0.06 1.14 0.00 0.34 0.04 0.00 .52 * p < .05 ** p < .01 more coercive than were those of Normals .
Normal Younger Older F value by : Age Antecedent Group Interaction Parents 0.74 Overall Aversive Neutral Positive .79 .66 ... 1.76 5.33 * 0.06 1.14 0.00 0.34 0.04 0.00 .52 * p < .05 ** p < .01 more coercive than were those of Normals .
Što ljudi govore - Napišite recenziju
Na uobičajenim mjestima nismo pronašli nikakve recenzije.
Sadržaj
Chapter | 1 |
Chapter | 11 |
Chapter 3 | 41 |
Autorska prava | |
Broj ostalih dijelova koji nisu prikazani: 7
Ostala izdanja - Prikaži sve
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
adults aggressive analysis antecedent antisocial children assumed attacks aversive aversive events baseline boys caretaker changes Chapter chil child behavior clinical coercive Command comparable conditional consequences consistent continue correlation delinquency demonstrated described determine deviant effect example experience extremely fact family members fathers Figure findings followed function given hypothesis identified included increase interaction involved irritable kind later learning less likelihood mean measures ment mothers negative normal noted observation occur OSLC outcome parents Patterson peers performance person physical positive present problem produce punishment question rates reactions referred Reid reinforcement relation reported response result reviewed role rules sample scores seems sequence served showed shown siblings significant significantly similar skills Social Aggressors Stealers stealing subjects suggest Table tend theory thought tion treatment values variables