Coercive Family Process, Opseg 3 |
Iz unutrašnjosti knjige
Rezultati 1 - 3 od 74.
Stranica 239
Chapter 11 Similarities and Differences Between Social Aggressors and Stealers One function of this chapter is to pull together the diverse themes and scattered findings that have been presented in preceding sections .
Chapter 11 Similarities and Differences Between Social Aggressors and Stealers One function of this chapter is to pull together the diverse themes and scattered findings that have been presented in preceding sections .
Stranica 252
The first step was to determine whether families of Social Aggressors were significantly different in interaction patterns from families of Normals and families of Stealers . The analyses proceeded in a sequence of two steps .
The first step was to determine whether families of Social Aggressors were significantly different in interaction patterns from families of Normals and families of Stealers . The analyses proceeded in a sequence of two steps .
Stranica 254
Table 11.3 Factor V : Social Aggression ( from Carlson , 1981a , b ) NEGATIVISM : A statement in which the verbal message ... Social Aggressors Essentially , the Social Aggressor is a child who directs his attacks against people rather ...
Table 11.3 Factor V : Social Aggression ( from Carlson , 1981a , b ) NEGATIVISM : A statement in which the verbal message ... Social Aggressors Essentially , the Social Aggressor is a child who directs his attacks against people rather ...
Što ljudi govore - Napišite recenziju
Na uobičajenim mjestima nismo pronašli nikakve recenzije.
Sadržaj
Chapter | 1 |
Chapter | 11 |
Chapter 3 | 41 |
Autorska prava | |
Broj ostalih dijelova koji nisu prikazani: 6
Ostala izdanja - Prikaži sve
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
adults aggressive analysis antecedent antisocial children assumed attacks aversive aversive events baseline boys caretaker changes Chapter chil child behavior clinical coercive Command comparable conditional consequences consistent continue correlation delinquent demonstrated described determine deviant effect example experience extremely fact family members fathers Figure findings followed function given hypothesis identified included increase interaction involved irritable kind later learning less likelihood mean measures ment mothers negative normal noted observation occur OSLC outcome parents patterns peers performance person physical positive present problem produce punishment question rates reactions referred Reid reinforcement relation reported response result reviewed role rules sample scores seems sequence served showed shown siblings significant significantly similar skills Social Aggressors Stealers stealing subjects suggest Table tend theory thought tion treatment values variables