Coercive Family Process, Opseg 3 |
Iz unutrašnjosti knjige
Rezultati 1 - 3 od 89.
Stranica 117
This would suggest that the suppression of ongoing behavior could not be accounted for by mere distractions due to emotional states or the disrupting effect of competing responses elicited by the aversive stimulus .
This would suggest that the suppression of ongoing behavior could not be accounted for by mere distractions due to emotional states or the disrupting effect of competing responses elicited by the aversive stimulus .
Stranica 143
Here the escape response usually changes only part of the stimulus . For example , following a successful counterattack , the family member may still be present , even though he or she has stopped behaving in an aversive manner .
Here the escape response usually changes only part of the stimulus . For example , following a successful counterattack , the family member may still be present , even though he or she has stopped behaving in an aversive manner .
Stranica 155
The reader might well ask why NR should account for variance relating to differences among responses but not for variance ... To understand what implications the probability of reinforcement has for a given response , it is necessary to ...
The reader might well ask why NR should account for variance relating to differences among responses but not for variance ... To understand what implications the probability of reinforcement has for a given response , it is necessary to ...
Što ljudi govore - Napišite recenziju
Na uobičajenim mjestima nismo pronašli nikakve recenzije.
Sadržaj
Chapter | 1 |
Chapter | 11 |
Chapter 3 | 41 |
Autorska prava | |
Broj ostalih dijelova koji nisu prikazani: 6
Ostala izdanja - Prikaži sve
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
adults aggressive analysis antecedent antisocial children assumed attacks aversive aversive events baseline boys caretaker changes Chapter chil child behavior clinical coercive Command comparable conditional consequences consistent continue correlation delinquent demonstrated described determine deviant effect example experience extremely fact family members fathers Figure findings followed function given hypothesis identified included increase interaction involved irritable kind later learning less likelihood mean measures ment mothers negative normal noted observation occur OSLC outcome parents patterns peers performance person physical positive present problem produce punishment question rates reactions referred Reid reinforcement relation reported response result reviewed role rules sample scores seems sequence served showed shown siblings significant significantly similar skills Social Aggressors Stealers stealing subjects suggest Table tend theory thought tion treatment values variables