 | South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - 1916 - Broj stranica: 634
...evidence from which negligence can be reasonably and legitimately inferred ; and it is for the jury to say whether from those facts when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred." Randall v. Railroad, 109 US 478, 3 Sup. Ct. 322, 27 L. Ed. 1003. It will thus be seen that the rule... | |
 | 1889 - Broj stranica: 794
...its application in your private studies. It is the duty of the Judge to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from which negligence may be reasonably inferred : the Jury has then to say whether, from those facts, negligence ought to be inferred. So then you have these... | |
 | Ohio. Constitutional Convention - 1874 - Broj stranica: 1110
...make men and women moral and honest, with what effect the history of the times too well illustrates. It is of the greatest importance in the administration of justice, that our judiciary should not only be | thoroughly uncorruptible, but also be above suspicion. But can we,... | |
 | Sir Arthur Underhill - 1878 - Broj stranica: 370
...discharge, and the jurors have another and a different duty. The judge has to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from which negligence...submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the greatest importance in the administration of justice, that these separate functions... | |
 | Nathaniel Cleveland Moak - 1880 - Broj stranica: 914
...discharge, and the jurors have another and a different duty. The judge lias to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from, which negligence...submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the greatest importance in the administration of justice that these separate functions... | |
 | Edward Lillie Pierce - 1881 - Broj stranica: 684
...exclusively a question of fact.5 A high authority has said, " The judge has to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from which negligence...reasonably inferred ; the jurors have to say whether, 1 The disposition of jurie8 in such 38 Iowa, 52; Fernandes v. Sacramento cases against corporations... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1883 - Broj stranica: 360
...facts have been established by evidence from which negligence mai/ iie reasonably inferred. The jury have to say whether from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the greatest importance in the administration of justice that those separate functions... | |
 | 1884 - Broj stranica: 676
...evidence from which negligence can be reasonably and legitimately inferred; and it is for the jury to say whether from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. Jackson, 3 App. Cas. 193. Tried by this test, there was no sufficient evidence... | |
 | 1916 - Broj stranica: 1326
...from these " facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. " It ifl, in my opinion, of the greatest importance in the ' administration of justice that these separate functions should (1) 3rd ed. 614. (3) LR 3 AC 193, 197. (2) 32 NZLR 1052; 15 GLR 662. 8.C. " be maintained, and should... | |
| |
The judge has a certain duty to discharge, and the jurors have another and a different duty. The judge has to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from, which negligence may be reasonably inferred ; the jurors have to say whether, from... 
