Thinking about Society: Theory and PracticeI. C. Jarvie was trained as a social anthropologist in the center of British social anthropology - the London School of Economics, where Bronislaw Malinowski was the object of ancestor worship. Jarvie's doctorate was in philosophy, however, under the guidance of Karl Popper and John Watkins. He changed his department not as a defector but as a rebel, attempting to exorcize the ancestral spirit. He criticized the method of participant obser vation not as useless but as not comprehensive: it is neither necessary nor sufficient for the making of certain contributions to anthropology; rather, it all depends on the problem-situation. And so Jarvie remained an anthro pologist at heart, who, in addition to some studies in rather conventional anthropological or sociological molds, also studied the tribe of social scien tists, but also critically examining their problems - especially their overall, rather philosophical problems, but not always so: a few of the studies in cluded in this volume exemplify his work on specific issues, whether of technology, or architecture, or nationalism in the academy, or moviemaking, or even movies exhibiting excessive sex and violence. These studies attract his attention both on account of their own merit and on account of their need for new and powerful research tools, such as those which he has forged in his own intellectual workshop over the last two decades. |
Što ljudi govore - Napišite recenziju
Na uobičajenim mjestima nismo pronašli nikakve recenzije.
Sadržaj
SOCIAL PERCEPTION AND SOCIAL CHANGE | 17 |
REALISM AND THE SUPPOSED POVERTY | 35 |
RATIONALITY AND RELATIVISM | 50 |
POPPER ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN | 70 |
THE EMERGENCE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOL | 95 |
ON THEORIES OF FIELDWORK AND | 107 |
LIMITS TO FUNCTIONALISM AND ALTERNA | 127 |
ON THE OBJECTIVITY OF ANTHROPOLOGY | 144 |
FREEMAN ON MEAD | 257 |
THE OBJECTIVITY OF CRITICISM OF | 265 |
THE RATIONALITY OF CREATIVITY | 282 |
TECHNOLOGY AND THE STRUCTURE | 302 |
THE SOCIAL CHARACTER OF TECHNOLOG | 314 |
IS TECHNOLOGY UNNATURAL? | 321 |
UTOPIA AND THE ARCHITECT | 328 |
NATIONALISM AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES | 352 |
THE PROBLEM OF ETHICAL INTEGRITY | 152 |
ANTHROPOLOGY AS SCIENCE AND THE | 162 |
EPISTLE TO THE ANTHROPOLOGISTS | 183 |
ON THE LIMITS OF SYMBOLIC INTERPRETA | 197 |
THE PROBLEM OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC REAL | 212 |
ANTHROPOLOGISTS AND THE IRRATIONAL | 233 |
EXPLORATIONS IN THE SOCIAL CAREER | 368 |
METHODOLOGICAL AND CONCEPTUAL PROB | 390 |
SOURCES | 476 |
487 | |
Ostala izdanja - Prikaži sve
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
action American answer anthropology argue argument attempt become believe called claim cognitive course creativity criticism culture discussion effect example experience explain fact false feminist field fieldwork film force function give given hence human ideas important individual institutions intellectual interest interpretation issue Journal kind knowledge language less live logical London look matter means method mind namely natural objective observer perhaps person Philosophy physical Popper pornography position possible practice present Press problem progress question rational reason relativism religion Review scientific scientists seems sense sexual situation social sciences society sociology statements suggest symbolic theory things thought tion tradition true truth turn understanding University women York