Slike stranica
PDF
ePub

structure. J. Farm Econ. 21:195-218. Feb.1939. 280.8 J822 Discussion by I. W. Arthur, p. 214-218.

Classifies markets into one group in which prices are readily and promptly available, and another for which prices are largely unavailable, and considers the question of price relationships between the central markets from the standpoint of buyers and sellers of livestock, and sellers of meats.

156. BJORKA, K., DOWELL, A. A., and ENGELMAN, G. Feeder cattle and sheep shipped into Minnesota. Minn. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 359, 24 p. May 1942. 100 M66

A report based on data from records of the Minnesota Live Stock Sanitary Board and covering for the most part the period 1936-40.

157. BROWN, A. J., and PHILLIPS, C. D. Market movement of livestock in Kentucky. Ky. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 446,43 p. June 1943. 100 K41

A study of the flow of livestock through the marketing system, the types of markets used by Kentucky farmers, the reasons why farmers choose particular markets, receipts at different types of markets, speculative sales, and the destination of Kentucky livestock.

158. CORN BELT LIVESTOCK MARKETING RESEARCH COMMITTEE. Marketing livestock in the Corn Belt region. S. Dak. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 365,198 p. Nov.1942. 100 So82

"Prepared by Knute Bjorka in collaboration with the other members of the committee."

A study the purpose of which was to determine the number, type, and location of marketing agencies and processors, how and where farmers sell and buy livestock, and the marketing methods and practices followed by farmers, by the middlemen who handle livestock, and by processors.

159. COTTON, W. P. Livestock marketing practices in South Dakota. S. Dak. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 362,79 p. June 1942. 100 So82 An inquiry dealing with the volume of cattle, hogs and sheep bought and sold by farmers and ranchers in this State in 1940; with the use made of various types of marketing agencies in moving animals from the farm to the feed lot and pasture or to the processor; and with the organization, customs and practices of these existing marketing agencies.

160. CURTISS, W. M., and MATZEN, E. H. Marketing New York livestock. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 744,36 p. Dec.1940. 100 N48C

Marketing at terminal markets and community livestock auctions, and direct to livestock dealers and butchers is discussed.

161. CURTISS, W. M. New York livestock goes to market. Farm Res. [N. Y. State Sta.] 12(2):15, 17. Apr.1,1946. 100 N48A

Available marketing facilities, meat consumption in New York, and suggestions for improvements in the marketing system.

162. DOWELL, A. A., and ENGELMAN, G. Livestock marketing channels used by Minnesota farmers. Minn. U. Agr. Ext. Farm Business Notes 233:1-2. May 1942. 275.29 M663

Information furnished by 2,347 farmers on schedules covering the year 1940.

163. ECKERT, P. S., and SLAGSVOLD, P. L. Montana cattle shipments; sources, destinations, and character of Montana's cattle shipments. Mont. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 358,44 p. May 1938. 100 M76 On the relationship between the number of beef cattle on farms and the number of cattle exported, the sources and destinations of exports, the influence of transportation facilities on market destinations, the seasonal movement of cattle exports, and the importance of cattle shipments in the receipts at central markets.

164. ETTESVOLD, W. L. Livestock marketing in North Dakota. N. Dak. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 314,37 p. June 1942. 100 N813

A study made to appraise the market practices and to trace the movement of feeder and slaughter livestock from farms to feeders and processors.

165. GAYLORD, C. G. Livestock marketing in Faribault County, Minnesota. Minn. U. Agr. Ext. Pam. 135,14 p. Apr. 1944. 275.29 M66P

Similar title in Minn. U. Agr. Ext. Farm Business Notes 266:1-2. Feb.23, 1945. 275.29 M663

Determines market outlets used by farmers, and methods employed in transporting livestock to market for the period 1941-42.

166. HENNING, G. F. Types of outlets used by Ohio farmers in marketing and purchasing their livestock. Ohio Agr. Expt. Sta. Bimon. B. 27(214):53-55. Jan./Feb.1942. 100 Oh3S

From this survey, made in the summer and autumn of 1941, the conclusion is drawn that Ohio farmers, when ready to market their livestock, depend principally upon auctions, concentration yards, and livestock dealers, and that less than 20 percent of the slaughter livestock is marketed to terminal markets.

167. HENRY, D. L., and WILEY, J. R. Marketing slaughter livestock in Indiana. Ind. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 522,23 p. July 1947. 100 In2P

On the classification and description of markets, the number and location of markets, the movement of livestock through types of markets, the size and number of markets used by farmers, reshipment of Indiana hogs for slaughter, and comparisons of competition and practices among types of markets.

168. HENRY, D. L. The movement of Indiana livestock from the farm to the processor. 1942. 120 p. Ref. Purdue U. Libr. Typewritten.

Thesis (Ph.D.) Purdue University.

A study to locate and describe the markets and marketing facilities available to farmers, and to analyze the marketing processes from the time livestock leaves the farm to the time of processing. Headings include The classification and location of markets, Sales and purchases of livestock, Practices followed in marketing livestock, Farmers changing markets and marketing agencies, and Livestock auctions.

169. HOTCHKISS, O. D. Marketing some principal crops: livestock. Oreg. Dept. Agr. B. 164:28. Dec.1949. 2 Or3 Refers to three main methods of marketing Oregon livestock, and discusses the importance of the livestock industry in Oregon.

170. HULBERT, H. H. Practices in livestock marketing-an appraisal. Amer. Coop. 16:614-624. 1940. 280.29 Am3A

Subjects include decentralization in marketing and processing, the increase of local markets and livestock auctions, weighing practices, and recommendations for a livestock cooperative program.

171. JACOB, A. W. Trends of livestock marketing in the South. Okla. Agr. Expt. Sta. Cur. Farm Econ. 20:15-22. Feb.1947. 100 Ok4 Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Workers Meeting, Biloxi, Miss., Jan. 16, 1947.

Public markets, terminal marketing organizations, cooperative credit and selling, transportation changes, and the graded lamb project are among the subjects discussed.

172. JONES, J. M. Selling and filling practices at the lamb markets. Natl. Wool Grower 31(11):12-13. Nov.1941. 45.8 N21N Replies to questions asked of various markets concerning lamb marketing problems.

173. KRAUSE, O. E., and CAPAROON, C. D. Wisconsin hog production and marketing. Wis. Dept. Agr. B. 295,44 p. May/June 1949. 2 W752Bu

The disposition of Wisconsin hogs in 1947, the market supply of hogs in Wisconsin, marketing methods and markets, and Wisconsin feeder pig operations.

174. LARSON, A. L. Sale of livestock by Oklahoma farmers. Okla. Agr. Expt. Sta. Cur. Farm Econ. 17:20-24. Feb.1944. 100 Ok4 Data based on information obtained by interviews and questionnaires from over 1,000 farmers concerning marketing methods which they used in 1940.

175. LIVESTOCK marketing channels used by Wisconsin farmers. Wis. Agr. Col. Ext. Econ. Inform. Wis. Farmers 13(10):1-4. Oct. 1942. 275.29 W75EC

Principal findings of a study of records received from 1,652 farmers.

176. LOCAL livestock marketing. Wis. Agr. Col. Ext. Econ. Inform. Wis. Farmers 13(11):1-4. Nov.1942. 275.29 W75Ec Marketing volume and operating practices of local livestock cooperatives and dealers, based on information from 10 Wisconsin counties.

177. MATZEN, E. H. Livestock marketing in New York State. 1939. 355 p. Cornell U. Libr.

[blocks in formation]

Based on a survey of 350 farms located in four areas of the State, on a State-wide mail questionnaire returned by 5,362 farmers, and on a schedule filled out by 2,461 high school agricultural students, this study assembles information relative to the amount of livestock marketed, the marketing practices followed by New York farmers, and the agencies involved, including dealers, local livestock butchers, community livestock auctions, and terminal livestock markets.

178. PHILLIPS, C. D. Livestock marketing program applicable to Southern areas. Amer. Coop. 17:369-379. 1942. 280.29 Am3A On the development of the marketing system in the South, including cooperatives, the avoidance of Federal supervision by the newer markets, and the requisites to the successful operation of cooperatives. 179. SHEPHERD, G., and STRAND, N. How Iowa farmers sell their hogs. Iowa Farm Econ. 5(1):15-16. Jan.1939. 275.28 I092 Based on data contained in the AAA hog compliance forms for 1933 showing variations in marketing practices.

180. THOMPSON, S. H. Choosing market outlets for livestock. Iowa Farm Econ. 2(2):9-11. Apr.1936. 275.28 1092.

Help to the farmer in enabling him to analyze the results of specific sales.

181. THOMPSON, S. H. County livestock marketing analysis, Guthrie county. Iowa Agr. Col. Ext. Serv. M567,28 p. Aug.1940. 275.2 Io92Cou

Types of markets used, important problems in livestock marketing, suggestions for increasing returns from livestock by more effective marketing, and the extent to which cooperatives can increase net returns in livestock marketing.

182. THOMPSON, S. H. County livestock marketing analysis, Wright county. Iowa Agr. Col. Ext. Serv. M531,21 p. Jan.1940. 275.2 1092Cou

Deals with the types of markets used, important livestock marketing problems, suggestions for increasing returns from livestock by more effective marketing, and the extent to which cooperatives can increase net returns in livestock marketing.

183. THOMPSON, S. H. County livestock marketing survey, Worth county. Iowa Agr. Col. Ext. Serv. M524,28 p. Jan.1940. 275.2 Io92Cou

On the types of markets used, important problems of livestock marketing, suggestions for increasing returns from livestock by more effective marketing, and the extent to which cooperatives can increase net returns in livestock marketing.

184. THOMPSON, S. H. Economic trends in livestock marketing. St. Louis, Swift, 1940. 174 p. Ref. 280.340 T37

Subjects include recent changes in livestock marketing, the increase of livestock income by effective marketing, and developing effective organization for cooperative livestock marketing.

185. THOMPSON, S. H. Economic trends in the marketing of Iowa livestock. 1937. 459 p. Ref. U. Minn. Dept. Agr. Libr. Typewritten.

Thesis (Ph.D.) University of Minnesota.

Published with slight changes under title Economic trends in livestock marketing, St. Louis, Swift, 1940. 174 p. Ref. 280.340 T37 Ch. 2, Recent changes in livestock marketing, deals in part with freight rates, direct trading and interior slaughter, grading and standardization, Government regulation, community livestock auctions in Iowa and other States, and organization of farmers for marketing; Ch. 3, How the individual farmer may increase his net livestock income by more effective marketing; Ch. 4, Developing effective organization for cooperative livestock marketing.

186. THOMSEN, F. L., and SMITH, E. B. How Missouri hogs are marketed. Mo. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 352,18 p. Aug.1935. 100 M693 Covers the analysis of sales recorded on AAA form C. H.-54 by some 13,672 Corn-Hog Contract signers in 49 counties.

187. WILLS, W. J. Choosing a market for Illinois hogs. Ill. Farm Econ. 174/175:927-930. Nov./Dec.1949. 275.28 IL5

Notes important factors to be considered by farmers before marketing their hogs.

188. WILLS, W. J. How Illinois farmers buy and sell sheep and lambs. Ill. Farm Econ. 162/163:758-760. Nov./Dec.1948. 275.28 IL5 Subjects include points of origin, location and time of slaughter, and how slaughter sheep are purchased.

189. WILSON, P. O. Essentials of a sound approach to a solution of the livestock marketing problem. Amer. Coop. 13:361-362. 1937. 280.29 Am3A

Favors the development of a national program with efficient, wellinformed sales agencies located at points where demand and volume are adequate for most economical units, with proper correlation between agencies to obtain for the producer a price fully reflecting the demand.

Local Dealers, Concentration Yards, and
Local Livestock Assembly

United States

190. ASHBY, R. C. Local livestock markets in relation to CornBelt hog marketing. Ill. Agr. Expt. Sta. B. 408:433-624. Dec.1934. 100 IL6S

Abstract in Ill. Agr. Expt. Sta. Abs. B. 408,20 p. Dec.1934. 100 IL6S

Claims to make the following new approaches: a broader conception of what is involved in livestock marketing costs; the significance of inequalities in the price of hogs to packers; the harmful effects of

[ocr errors][merged small]

inequitable freight rates; the grouping of packers according to the method and the place of livestock purchasing and of their function in the industry; the effects of local-market operation upon terminal markets; and the possible effects of the concentration of large-volume purchases upon wholesale meat prices.

191. CROUCH, H. E. Regional livestock markets. Natl. Assoc. Mktg. Off. Proc. 20:26-30. 1938. 280.39 N213P

Results of a study made in New York State and in certain States of the Central West to serve as a basis for setting up a State-wide marketing program in New York. Subjects include the rapid growth of livestock auctions, differences of opinion concerning them, definition and general powers of a market authority, the principal features of a regional market, and financing and working of the plan.

192. ENGELMAN, G., and DOWELL, A. A. Licensed livestock
buyers in Minnesota. Farm Business Notes 219:3. Mar.1941.
275.29 M663

Notes that the distribution of licensed livestock buyers is influenced
both by the distribution of livestock on farms and by methods em-
ployed in marketing slaughter livestock, and that buyers appear to be
more numerous in direct marketing areas than in areas where a
higher proportion of the animals are consigned for sale at public mar-
kets. Fig. 1 shows the distribution of licensed livestock buyers in
Minnesota as of Jan. 1, 1941.

193. HENNING, G. F. Some factors to be considered in the location of Ohio's livestock markets. Ohio State U. Dept. Rur. Econ. Mimeog. B. 175,61 p. Apr. 1944. 281.9 Oh32

Analyzes the present situation and shows some of the trends affecting production and marketing, points out some of the yardsticks that can be used in market location, and applies the results of the foregoing analysis to the job of properly locating markets in this State. 194. SHEPHERD, G., and STRAND, N. V. Local hog marketing practices in Iowa. Iowa Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. B. 262:149-184. Aug.1939. 100 109

Shows the farmer's end of the marketing machinery in selling hogs for the year 1933.

Auctions

United States

195. ASHBY, R. C. Auctions as a method of marketing livestock. Assoc. South. Agr. Workers. Proc. 39:116-117. 1938. 4 C82

A consideration of the important problems and other factors in auction operations.

196. ASHBY, R. C. The place of livestock auction' markets. Coop. J. 12:84. May/June 1938. 280.28 C7824

Analyzes the results of a study made in Illinois in the fall of 1936,
and information obtained through revisiting 14 auctions in the fall
of 1937.

197. BAKER, J. M. Louisiana livestock auctions. La. Agr. Expt. Sta. Mimeog. C. 10,30 p. July 1940. 100 L935

Including all auctions operating in Louisiana as of June 30, 1939, and reports from 207 livestock producers located in all parts of the State, this report has as its main purposes the determination of the economic causes for the development of auctions in Louisiana, the nature of the business, the method of operation, the economic relationship of auctions to livestock producers, and the evaluation of auc tions as a method of marketing Louisiana livestock.

198. BARLOW, E. S. Urges uniform regulations for livestock

« PrethodnaNastavi »