 a contract of a corporation, which Is ultra vires, In the proper sense, that Is to say, outside the object of its creation as defined in the law of its organization, and therefore beyond the powers conferred upon it by the Legislature, Is not voidable...  Reports of Cases Determined in the Appellate Courts of Illinois - Stranica 291napisao/la Illinois. Appellate Court, Martin L. Newell, Mason Harder Newell, Walter Clyde Jones, Keene Harwood Addington, James Christopher Cahill, Basil Jones, James Max Henderson, Ray Smith - 1900Potpun prikaz - O ovoj knjizi
 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1912 - Broj stranica: 970
...sense, that is to say, outside the object of its creation as defined in the law of its organization, and, therefore, beyond the powers conferred upon it...not to have made it, but that it could not make it. Such a contract can not be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either.... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1916 - Broj stranica: 720
...sense, — that is to say, outside the object of its creation as denned in the law of its organization and therefore beyond the powers conferred upon it...voidable, only, but wholly void and of no legal effect." (Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman Palace Car Co. 139 US 24.) No action can be maintained upon... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1907 - Broj stranica: 714
...voidable, but is wholly void and without any legal effect. The objection to the contract in such case is not merely that the corporation ought not to have made it, but that it could not make it. Such a contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1896 - Broj stranica: 1244
...—that Is to say, outside the object of its creation, as defined In the law of its organization,— and therefore beyond the powers conferred upon It...not to have made It but that It could not make it Such a contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either.... | |
 | 1912 - Broj stranica: 1332
...sense — that Is to say, outside the object of its creation as defined In the law of its organization, and therefore beyond the powers conferred upon it...not to have made It, but that it could not make it. Such a contract cannot be ratified by either party, because It could not have been authorized by either.... | |
 | 1904 - Broj stranica: 1174
...as defined by the law of its organization, and that from beyond the power conferred upon it by tlie Legislature, is not voidable only, but -wholly void...corporation ought not to have made it, but that it соцШ not make it. The contract cannot be ratified by either, because it could not have been authorized... | |
 | 1918 - Broj stranica: 1332
...voidable, but is wholly void and without any legal effect. The objection to the contract in such case is not merely that the corporation ought not to have made it, but that it could not make it. Such a contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1891 - Broj stranica: 780
...sense, that is to say, outside the object of its creation as defined in the law of its organization, and therefore beyond the powers conferred upon it...contract is, not merely that the corporation ought not to hare made it, but that it could not make it. The contract canOpinion of the Court. not be ratified... | |
 | 1905 - Broj stranica: 856
...sense, that Js to sny, outside the object of its creation as defined in the law of its or gnnization, and therefore beyond the powers conferred upon it...voidable only, but wholly void and of no legal effect and it cannot be validated by estoppel. — Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. Lombard,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - Broj stranica: 774
...— that is to say, outside the object of its creation, as defined in the law of its organization, and, therefore, beyond the powers conferred upon it...voidable only, but wholly void and of no legal effect. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co., 139 US 24, 59, 60 ; Pennsylvania Railroad v.... | |
| |
