Studying Peoples in the People's Democracies: Socialist Era Anthropology in South-east Europe. IILIT Verlag Münster, 2008 - Broj stranica: 454 Bulgaria and Serbia during socialism are outlined from many different points of view in this volume. Beyond local and personal trajectories the authors illuminate more general and comparative questions. Was there anything like a "socialist anthropology", common to all three countries? Did Soviet and/or Marxist influences, in the discipline and in society in general, penetrate so deeply as to form an unavoidable common denominator of anthropological practice? The answers turn out to be complex and subtle. While unifying ideological forces were very strong in the 1950s, diversity increased thereafter. Anthropology was entangled with national ideology in all three countries, but the evidence nonetheless calls for "polyphonic" interpretations. |
Sadržaj
| 21 | |
De Gustibus non disputandum Romanian Folk Studies | 41 |
The Socialist Market | 55 |
Practices of Ethnological | 81 |
Personalities | 115 |
Local Uses of Three Soviet Ethnographic Concepts | 137 |
The Debate between Folklorists and Ethnographers | 157 |
The Bulgarian Ethnography of the Bulgarian Academy | 177 |
Ethnographical Institute of the Serbian Academy | 261 |
Ideological | 307 |
Zagorka Goluboviüs Socio | 337 |
The Meeting Point of American | 353 |
An interview with David Kideckel | 383 |
An inteview with Carol Silverman | 397 |
Concluding Remarks | 423 |
Contributors | 447 |
Anthropology as a Profession | 185 |
Brief Encounters Dangerous Liaisons and Neverending | 211 |
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
academic activities American anthropology approach became become beginning Belgrade Beograd building Bulgarian century changes collection communism communist concept considered context continued course critical culture Department director discipline early established ethnic Ethnographic Museum ethnologists ethnology ethnos example exhibition existence fact field fieldwork Filipoviü folklore folklorists foreign ideas identity ideological important individual influence Institute intellectual interest issues kind Kulišiü later living Marxism material means objects official organization origin party peasant period political popular position possible practice present problems production professional Professor published question regime region relations remained represented result role Romanian scholars scientific Serbian social socialist society Soviet specific started structure theoretical theory tion took traditional University village volume World Yugoslav Yugoslavia