Coercive Family Process, Opseg 3 |
Iz unutrašnjosti knjige
Rezultati 1 - 3 od 84.
Stranica 63
Table 3.6 Parent Occupation for Two Samples Table 3.7 Age Distributions for Both Target and Problem Children Percentage for Nonproblem target Problem children children ( N = 40 ) ( N = 170 ) Table 3.8 Family Size for Two Samples ...
Table 3.6 Parent Occupation for Two Samples Table 3.7 Age Distributions for Both Target and Problem Children Percentage for Nonproblem target Problem children children ( N = 40 ) ( N = 170 ) Table 3.8 Family Size for Two Samples ...
Stranica 151
Table 7.6 Likelihood of Counterattack by Sample and Agents Mean likelihood of counterattack Table 7.7 Favorable Outcomes ( Utility ) for Counterattacks in. Dyads Social Aggressors Normals Stealers F Values p ( Mother Child ) .15 .23 .16 ...
Table 7.6 Likelihood of Counterattack by Sample and Agents Mean likelihood of counterattack Table 7.7 Favorable Outcomes ( Utility ) for Counterattacks in. Dyads Social Aggressors Normals Stealers F Values p ( Mother Child ) .15 .23 .16 ...
Stranica 209
Table 9.5 Mutuality for Coerciveness Among Family Members Table 9.6 Analysis of Changes in Affectional Behavior During Reciprocity. Family Member Problem Child Male Sibling Female Sibling Father Mother Median .81 ** .24 .62 .78 .32 ...
Table 9.5 Mutuality for Coerciveness Among Family Members Table 9.6 Analysis of Changes in Affectional Behavior During Reciprocity. Family Member Problem Child Male Sibling Female Sibling Father Mother Median .81 ** .24 .62 .78 .32 ...
Što ljudi govore - Napišite recenziju
Na uobičajenim mjestima nismo pronašli nikakve recenzije.
Ostala izdanja - Prikaži sve
Uobičajeni izrazi i fraze
adults aggressive analysis antecedent antisocial children assumed attacks aversive aversive events baseline boys caretaker changes Chapter chil child behavior clinical coercive Command comparable conditional consequences consistent continue correlation delinquent demonstrated described determine deviant effect example experience extremely fact family members fathers Figure findings followed function given hypothesis identified included increase interaction involved irritable kind later learning less likelihood mean measures ment mothers negative normal noted observation occur OSLC outcome parents pattern peers performance person physical positive possible present problem produce punishment question rates reactions referred reinforcement relation reported response result reviewed role rules sample scores seems sequence served showed shown siblings significant significantly similar skills Social Aggressors Stealers stealing subjects suggest Table tend theory thought tion treatment values variables