...maker who warranted it "burglar proof," is the difference between the value of the safe as it was, and what it would have been worth, if it had been as represented ; and not the damages sustained in the loss of valuables taken out of it by burglars." That to justify...

...who warranted it "burglar-proof," ia the difference bej tween the value of the safe as it was. and what It would have been worth If it had been as represented; mill not the damages sustained in the loss of valuables taken out of the safe by burglars, who effected...

...worth at least $10 per share. The ruling in that case was that : "The measure of damages was not the difference between the contract price and the reasonable...value if the property had been as represented to be, even If the stock had been worth the price paid for it ; nor, If the stock were worthless, could the...

...justice said, touching the measure of damages for deceit, that: . "The measure of damages was not the difference between the contract price and the reasonable...value if the property had been as represented to be, even if the stock had been worth the price paid for it; nor, if the stock were worthless, could the...

...of the United States and this court, in harmony therewith, is that the measure of damages is not the difference between the contract price and the reasonable market value, if the property sold or exchanged had been as represented to be. As said by Mr. Chief Justice Fuller in the case of...

...measure of damages is the difference between the value of the land purchased, as it was at the time, and what it would have been worth if it had been as represented. Johnston v. Beeney, CJl 2. False representations. — In an action for deceit in the sale of Innd,...

...instruction to be erroneous. Speaking by the Chief Justice we said: "The measure of damages was not the ՚ A L4 " N A- u <ᖧ 5 'Ưg Y , E w ` ^ -H 6̓ 6 δ +M= C: } 5 )H FlB A_O0} z ٍ ,q even if the stock had been worth the price paid for it; nor, if the stock were worthless, could the...

...be shown in the evidence before ' you." In this there was error. The measure of damages was not the difference between the contract price and the reasonable...value if the property had been as represented to be, even if the stock had been worth the price paid for it; nor, if the stock were worthless, could the...

...may be shown in the evidence before you." In this there was error. The measure of damages was not the difference between the contract price and the reasonable...value if the property had been as represented to be, even if the stock had been worth the price paid for it ; nor if the stock were worthless, could the...

...find from the evidence the difference in the value of the machine as it actually was as compared with what it would have been worth if it "had been as represented. " This difference in value, together with a reasonable compensation for lass of time both by the defendant...