 It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." The recognition of its existence even by other States, and the enforcement of its contracts made therein, depend purely upon the comity of those States...  Albany Law Journal - Stranica 2761902Potpun prikaz - O ovoj knjizi
 | Richard Peters - 1860 - Broj stranica: 836
...when that law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existence. It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But although it may live and have its being in that state only, yet it does not follow that its existence... | |
 | Daniel Gardner - 1860 - Broj stranica: 740
...law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, that the corporation can have no existence ; that it must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But a corporation may act and contract in any foreign nation, and much more in any other State of our... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1911 - Broj stranica: 726
...authority of the sovereignty in which it wishes to act. As was said in Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet. 519: "It must dwell in the place of its creation and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." Having no absolute right of recognition in other States but depending for such recognition and enforcement... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1862 - Broj stranica: 658
...it. Indeed, this court has said, in the case of the Bank of Augusta vs. Earle, that a corporation " must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereign ty." 13 Pet., 588. And in Runyan vs. Lessee of Coster this court again said : "A corporation... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1863 - Broj stranica: 654
...where that law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existence. It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to anAspinwall et al. v. The Ohio and Mississippi 11. 11. Co. et al. other sovereignty. But, although... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1863 - Broj stranica: 732
...corporation can have no legal existence beyond the limits of the state or country creating it, and that it must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate, yet the courts follow them up with important qualifications. In Bard v. Poole, cited supra, Judge Denio... | |
 | Elliott Anthony - 1865 - Broj stranica: 320
...State. It can have no legal existence out of the boundaries of the sovereignty by which it is created, must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. The case of McCall v. Byram Manufacturing Company, 5 Conn., has been regarded as deciding, that corporations... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1909 - Broj stranica: 746
...decided that " a corporation can have no legal existence outside of the place in which it was created ; must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." For, though a non-resident corporation, it might contract, through its agents, within the District... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1867 - Broj stranica: 744
...where that law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existence. It must dwell in the place. of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." And the same thing, substantially, is repeated in another case 8 by Mr. Justice Thompson. 5. There... | |
 | Iowa. Supreme Court - 1868 - Broj stranica: 658
...can have no legal existence out of the boundaries of the sovereignty by which it is created. * * * It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But although it must live and have its being in that State only, yet it does not by any means follow,... | |
| |
