 But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful...  The Federal Reporter - Stranica 4741905Potpun prikaz - O ovoj knjizi
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1916 - Broj stranica: 700
...regard to the wires was the proximate cause of the injury. In order to warrant a finding that negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances, but it is not... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1913 - Broj stranica: 694
...instruments. (Page 62.) 8. SAME — PROXIMATE CAUSE. — To warrant a finding that an act of negligence is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act, and that it ought reasonably to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1912 - Broj stranica: 708
...that "it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequences of the negligent and wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances." When the instructions which were given are read together, as they should... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1909 - Broj stranica: 668
...incompetent and prejudicial. "To recover damages on account of the unintentional negligence of another, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances. 69 Ark. 405.... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - 1888 - Broj stranica: 634
...injury as is shown to have been the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act — such as ought to have been foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances. (Glover v. L. cfe SWR Co., LR, 3 QB, 25 ; Milwaukee R. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US, 469.) Applying this rule,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1911 - Broj stranica: 700
...fundamental rule of law that, to recover damages on account of the unintentional negligence of another, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." In the... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1913 - Broj stranica: 760
...fundamental rule of law that, to recover damages on account of unintentional negligence of another, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. St. Louis,... | |
 | 1888 - Broj stranica: 912
...difficult. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of...wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in 91 the light of the attending circumstances." To the same effect is the language of the court in McDonald... | |
 | John Houston Merrill, Charles Frederic Williams, Thomas Johnson Michie, David Shephard Garland - 1891 - Broj stranica: 1052
...cases, and by leading text writers, that " in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause...consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it was such as might or ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances."4 But... | |
| |
