...constitute those charged with the administration of the government, as the sheriffs, clerks, judges, etc. "Courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. In all these, and the like cases, where the memory of the judge is at fault, he resorts to such documents...

...provide adequate, or indeed any, compensation for such results. This is a matter of common knowledge, and 'courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally -known within the limits of their jurisdiction.' Greenl. Ev. § 6." Later in the opinion the court said: "In construing this agreement in the light...

...defined. Grtenlcaf, in his work on Evidence (vol. 1, sec. 6), sums it up in these words : "In fine, courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." In a note thereto, he adds : "There is not much consistency in the cases, and possibly this may result...

...office as such notaiy public has not expired at the time this act becomes a law. Now, '•Courts will take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction and public matters affecting the government of this country." Greenl. Evid. gees. 5, C, and cases cited....

...relations, as seen in Mr. Greenleaf's Treatise on Evidence, voL l, S 4. 'In fine [says he], courts will take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their Jurisdiction.' Section 6, c. 2." In Mitchell v. State, 115 Md. 360-369, 80 Atl. 1020-1023, the law provided for an...

...therefore, be proved. " In tine," says. Chief Judge HUNT in Stdnnertftn v. Columbian Fns. (Jo., 37 NY 174, "courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction ; * * * where the memory of the judge is at fault, he resorts to such documents of reference as may...

...respect to each other. (See 1 Greenleaf on Evidence, sec. 6.) And the author also says: "In fine, a court will generally take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of its jurisdiction." (See, also, 1 Phillips on Evidence, p. 625; 12 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 151; an...

...within our jurisdiction is a matter of which we can take judicial notice. The Court will take judicial notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of its jurisdiction: 1 Greenleaf, sec. 6. Courts may properly take judicial notice of facts that may be...

...referred to. This court soon after its organization adopted the general rule laid down by Mr. Greenleaf: "Courts will generally take notice of whatever ought...generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction." (Moore v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 14.) And this has always been the rule in this court and the Supreme...

...attack is made, nor attempt to prove any irregularity in the proceedings. As a general rule, Courts will take notice of whatever ought to be generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction. They take notice who fill the various county offices within their jurisdiction. (Wetherbee v. Dunn,...